Law Commission consultation on contempt of court

Closes 8 Nov 2024

Chapter 9: Representation in contempt proceedings (Q 92-99)

Consultation Question 92:

We provisionally conclude that for the purposes of legal aid for the defendant, both permission proceedings and committal proceedings are considered to be criminal proceedings.

Do consultees agree?

Consultation Question 93:

We provisionally propose that eligibility for legal aid for an application to discharge a committal order should be expressly stated, whether in statute or in policy.

Do consultees agree?

Consultation Question 94:

We provisionally conclude that applications to discharge committal orders are criminal proceedings for the purposes of legal aid.

Do consultees agree?

Consultation Question 95:

We provisionally propose that means testing for legal aid should apply in all contempt proceedings.

Do consultees agree? 

If means testing for legal aid were to apply in all contempt proceedings, are there any categories of cases that should be carved out as exceptions where means testing should not apply?

Consultation Question 96:

To what extent are defendants in civil contempt proceedings hampered in their access to legal aid?

Are defendants in anti-social behaviour injunction proceedings at a particular or specific disadvantage?

What changes to the current law or the current processes would remedy problems with access to legal aid for defendants in civil contempt proceedings?

Consultation Question 97:

We provisionally propose that contempt proceedings (including permission proceedings) should be criminal proceedings for the purposes of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 and thus any conditional fee agreement should not be enforceable in relation to those proceedings.

Do consultees agree?

Consultation Question 98:

Where a court is determining costs in contempt proceedings that were commenced on application in a civil court, should there be a requirement that the court consider the defendant’s financial resources?

If there were a requirement that a civil court must consider the defendant's financial resources when determining costs in contempt proceedings, how should this be done?

Consultation Question 99:

We provisionally propose that where a defendant is legally aided in contempt proceedings in a civil court then the costs should not exceed the amount (if any) which it is reasonable for the individual to pay having regard to all the circumstances, including:

(1) the financial resources of all of the parties to the proceedings; and

(2) their conduct in connection with the dispute to which the proceedings relate.

Do consultees agree?