Closes 30 Nov 2023
This service needs cookies enabled.
The prosecution may appeal to the Court of Appeal against decisions made in preparatory hearings. They may also appeal “terminating” decisions made during the trial. This includes both rulings which would formally terminate or stay proceedings, but also certain other rulings if the prosecution is prepared to guarantee that if leave to appeal is not obtained or the appeal is abandoned, the defendant will be acquitted. Rulings made after the judge has started summing-up cannot be appealed in this way.
The Attorney General can refer to the Court of Appeal a question on a legal ruling made during proceedings where a person has been acquitted. The Attorney General can also refer to the Court of Appeal a sentence (for certain offences) if they consider it is “unduly lenient”.
Where a person has been acquitted by a magistrates’ court, it may be possible for the prosecution to challenge the decision by an appeal by way of case stated or judicial review.
An acquittal in proceedings on indictment can only be quashed in two circumstances: where a person has been convicted of an administration of justice offence in relating to the proceedings which resulted in the acquittal; and for a limited number of very serious offences, where there is compelling new evidence against the acquitted person.
Third parties who are affected by decisions in magistrates’ court proceedings may be able to challenge those decisions through an appeal by way of case stated or judicial review. There are limited ways in which a decision made during a trial on indictment can be challenged by third parties.